Author:
Bloom Nicholas,Liang James,Roberts John,Ying Zhichun Jenny
Abstract
Abstract
A rising share of employees now regularly engage in working from home (WFH), but there are concerns this can lead to “shirking from home.” We report the results of a WFH experiment at Ctrip, a 16,000-employee, NASDAQ-listed Chinese travel agency. Call center employees who volunteered to WFH were randomly assigned either to work from home or in the office for nine months. Home working led to a 13% performance increase, of which 9% was from working more minutes per shift (fewer breaks and sick days) and 4% from more calls per minute (attributed to a quieter and more convenient working environment). Home workers also reported improved work satisfaction, and their attrition rate halved, but their promotion rate conditional on performance fell. Due to the success of the experiment, Ctrip rolled out the option to WFH to the whole firm and allowed the experimental employees to reselect between the home and office. Interestingly, over half of them switched, which led to the gains from WFH almost doubling to 22%. This highlights the benefits of learning and selection effects when adopting modern management practices like WFH.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference40 articles.
1. “The Polarization of the US Labor Market,”;Autor;American Economic Review,2006
2. “Does Job Testing Harm Minority Workers? Evidence from Retail Establishments,”;Autor;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2008
3. “Disruption of Office Related Tasks by Speech and Office Noise,”;Banbury;British Journal of Psychology,1998
4. “Social Preferences and the Response to Incentives: Evidence from Personnel Data,”;Bandiera;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2005
5. “Incentives for Managers and Inequality Among Workers: Evidence from a Firm Level Experiment,”;Bandiera;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2007
Cited by
938 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献