Affiliation:
1. Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh, Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Abstract
Abstract
Citizenship deprivation is becoming an increasingly standard response of modern states to criminal and other harmful acts. Current academic attempts to determine the sanction’s legitimacy are, however, frustrated by the inadequate understanding of its nature. Departing from a dominant perspective that considers denationalization as punishment, this article conducts an original study of citizenship policies in 37 European democracies and contrasts them with key principles of punishment. The findings raise serious doubts regarding the penal nature of denationalization: I propose instead that denationalization is better understood as a sui generis sanction, which seeks to relieve the polity of those members who fail to satisfy fundamental citizenship requirements. This position has serious implications for our understanding and justification of modern revocation practices.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Law,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference104 articles.
1. The Ordered and the Bordered Society: Migration Control, Citizenship, and the Northern Penal State’,;Aas,2013
2. Stripping Citizenship: Does Membership Have Its (Moral) Privileges?’;Akhtar;Australasian Journal of Philosophy,2017
3. Theories of Loss of Citizenship;Aleinikoff,1986
4. Transnational Histories of Penal Transportation: Punishment, Labour and Governance in the British Imperial World, 1788–1939’;Anderson;Australian Historical Studies,2016
5. Citizenship, Deportation and the Boundaries of Belonging’;Anderson;Citizenship Studies,2011
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献