Live Facial Recognition: Trust and Legitimacy as Predictors of Public Support for Police Use of New Technology

Author:

Bradford Ben1,Yesberg Julia A1,Jackson Jonathan23,Dawson Paul4

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Global City Policing, Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK

2. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

3. University of Sydney Law School, Camperdown, Australia

4. Mayors Office for Policing and Crime, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Facial recognition technology is just one of a suite of new digital tools police and other security providers around the world are adopting in an effort to function more safely and efficiently. This paper reports results from a major new London-based study exploring public responses to Live Facial Recognition (LFR): a technology that enables police to carry out real-time automated identity checks in public spaces. We find that public trust and legitimacy are important factors predicting the acceptance or rejection of LFR. Crucially, trust and, particularly, legitimacy seem to serve to alleviate privacy concerns about police use of this technology. In an era where police use of new technologies is only likely to increase, especially as the Covid-19 global pandemic develops, these findings have important implications for police–public relations and how the ‘public voice’ is fed into debates.

Funder

Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. ‘Paradoxical Effects of Self-Awareness of Being Observed: Testing the Effect of Police Body-worn Cameras on Assaults and Aggression Against Officers’,;Ariel;Journal of Experimental Criminology,2018

2. ‘Police Facial Recognition System Faces Legal Challenge’,;BBC,2018

3. ‘Face Off: The Lawless Growth of Facial Recognition in UK Policing’,;Big Brother Watch,2018

4. ‘Police Legitimacy Among Immigrants in Europe: Institutional Frames and Group Position’,;Bradford;European Journal of Criminology,,2018

5. ‘Contact and Confidence: Revisiting the Impact of Public Encounters with the Police’,;Bradford;Policing and Society,,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3