Are Minorities Subjected to, or Insulated from, Racialized Policing in Majority–Minority Community Contexts?

Author:

Gaston Shytierra1,Brunson Rod K2,Grossman Leigh S3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

2. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

3. School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA

Abstract

Abstract Racial conflict theories suggest that racialized policing should wane in areas where people of colour are the majority and Whites, the minority. This article examines community-level predictors of racial/ethnic differences in drug arrests from 2011 to 2016 across 86 census tracts in Newark, NJ, a city where most officers and residents are persons of colour. We examine whether racial conflict indicators predict Black, White and Hispanic drug arrests, accounting for other factors. Findings indicate that racialized policing prevails within this majority–minority context. Officers tend to arrest Blacks in communities with greater White and Hispanic residents and Whites in predominantly Black areas. In contrast, Hispanic arrests are not attributable to racialized policing. We conclude with recommendations for future theoretical redevelopment.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference107 articles.

1. ‘Optimising Rigour in Focus Group Analysis: Using Content/Thematic and Form/Structural Approaches to Understand British Somali’s Experiences of Policing in London’;Ahmed;International Social Science Review,2017

2. ‘Living With Non-State Policing in South Africa: The Issues and Dilemmas’;Baker;The Journal of Modern African Studies,2002

3. ‘Black Minority Ethnic Communities and Levels of Satisfaction With Policing: Findings From a Study in the North of England’;Barrett;Criminology & Criminal Justice,2014

4. ‘Poverty, Crack, and Crime: A Cross-City Analysis’;Baumer;Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,1994

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3