Competing Views of Word Meaning: Word Embeddings and Word Senses

Author:

Grefenstette Gregory1,Hanks Patrick2

Affiliation:

1. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition , Pensacola , United States

2. University of Wolverhampton , Wolverhampton , United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract At least since the invention of writing, people have been troubled by the problem of what a word means. Dictionaries have traditionally been written with numbered word senses, giving the impression that the different senses of a word are fixed abstract entities, which can be used to separate usages into neat piles according to their different meanings. Adam Kilgarriff’s daring 1997 article ‘I Don’t Believe in Word Senses’ challenged this traditional view of word meaning, presenting an account in which ‘the basic units are occurrences of the word in context’. Kilgarriff went on to develop the Sketch Engine, a statistical tool that enables lexicographers and NLP researchers, teachers, and students to explore the relationship between meanings and collocations (words and their contexts). In this review article, we compare the information provided by Kilgarriff’s Word Sketches with the recently developed Word Embedding techniques and with the results of Corpus Pattern Analysis.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Language and Linguistics

Reference27 articles.

1. Tailoring continuous word representations for dependency parsing.;Bansal,2014

2. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography.;Church;Computational linguistics,1990

3. ’Indexing by latent semantic analysis.;Deerwester;Journal of the American society for information science,1990

4. ’Natural language processing (almost) from scratch.’;Collobert;The Journal of Machine Learning Research,2011

5. word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.’s negative-sampling word-embedding method.;Goldberg,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Obituary: Patrick Wyndham Hanks;International Journal of Lexicography;2024-03-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3