Carbapenem inactivation method using bacterial lysate and MOPS (LCIM): a very sensitive method for detecting carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter species

Author:

Yamada Kageto12,Aoki Kotaro2,Nagasawa Tatsuya2,Imai Waka1,Sasaki Masakazu12,Murakami Hinako1,Morita Toshisuke3,Ishii Yoshikazu2,Tateda Kazuhiro2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Toho University Medical Centre Omori Hospital, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan

2. Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 5-21-16 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan

3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 5-21-6 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Detection of carbapenem-hydrolysing class D β-lactamase (CHDL)-producing Acinetobacter spp. is critical for understanding antibiotic resistance. In this study, we compared the available detection techniques derived from the carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), using CHDL-producing Acinetobacter spp., and developed a modified method that uses bacterial lysate (lysate CIM; LCIM). Methods A total of 159 Acinetobacter spp. (102 carbapenemase producers and 57 non-producers) and 14 Pseudomonas spp. (7 carbapenemase producers and 7 non-producers) were tested. Modified CIM, simplified CIM, CIMTris, Triton-CIM and LCIM were compared using these strains. Distinct from the CIM, LCIM includes a longer incubation period (4 h) with 2.0% Triton X-100 (v/v) in 20 mM MOPS buffer instead of water. Results The sensitivity/specificity of the modified CIM, simplified CIM, CIMTris, Triton-CIM and LCIM were 71.6%/100%, 66.1%/89.1%, 88.1%/95.3%, 80.7%/100% and 97.2%/100%, respectively. LCIM was the most sensitive and specific. Conclusions Use of bacterial lysate and MOPS increased the sensitivity of the CIM in detecting CHDL-producing Acinetobacter spp.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Microbiology (medical)

Reference18 articles.

1. “Stormy waters ahead”: global emergence of carbapenemases;Patel;Front Microbiol,2013

2. Evaluation of the rapid carbapenem inactivation method (rCIM): a phenotypic screening test for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae;Muntean;J Antimicrob Chemother,2018

3. Multicenter evaluation of the modified carbapenem inactivation method and the Carba NP for detection of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii;Simner;J Clin Microbiol,2018

4. Comparison of the Modified-Hodge test, Carba NP test, and carbapenem inactivation method as screening methods for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae;Yamada;J Microbiol Methods,2016

5. Modified carbapenem inactivation method for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production among Enterobacteriaceae;Pierce;J Clin Microbiol,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3