Efficacy of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Kashour Zakariya1ORCID,Riaz Muhammad2,Garbati Musa A3ORCID,AlDosary Oweida4,Tlayjeh Haytham5,Gerberi Dana6,Murad M Hassan78,Sohail M Rizwan910,Kashour Tarek11,Tleyjeh Imad M491213

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

2. Department of Statistics, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan

3. Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria

4. Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Medical Specialties, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

5. Department of Intensive Care, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Saud bin Abdulaziz for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

6. Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

7. Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA

8. Division of Preventive, Occupational and Aerospace Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA

9. Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA

10. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA

11. Department of Cardiac Sciences, King Fahad Cardiac Center, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

12. Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA

13. College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Clinical studies of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in COVID-19 disease reported conflicting results. We sought to systematically evaluate the effect of CQ and HCQ with or without azithromycin on outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Methods We searched multiple databases, preprints and grey literature up to 17 July 2020. We pooled only adjusted-effect estimates of mortality using a random-effect model. We summarized the effect of CQ or HCQ on viral clearance, ICU admission/mechanical ventilation and hospitalization. Results Seven randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 14 cohort studies were included (20 979 patients). Thirteen studies (1 RCT and 12 cohort studies) with 15 938 hospitalized patients examined the effect of HCQ on short-term mortality. The pooled adjusted OR was 1.05 (95% CI 0.96–1.15, I2 = 0%). Six cohort studies examined the effect of the HCQ+azithromycin combination with a pooled adjusted OR of 1.32 (95% CI 1.00–1.75, I2 = 68.1%). Two cohort studies and four RCTs found no effect of HCQ on viral clearance. One small RCT demonstrated improved viral clearance with CQ and HCQ. Three cohort studies found that HCQ had no significant effect on mechanical ventilation/ICU admission. Two RCTs found no effect for HCQ on hospitalization risk in outpatients with COVID-19. Conclusions Moderate certainty evidence suggests that HCQ, with or without azithromycin, lacks efficacy in reducing short-term mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 or risk of hospitalization in outpatients with COVID-19.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Microbiology (medical)

Cited by 106 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3