Factors Associated With Variation in Home-Range Size of Appalachian Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa Umbellus)

Author:

Whitaker Darroch M.1,Stauffer Dean F.1,Norman Gary W.2,Devers Patrick K.1,Edwards John3,Giuliano William M.4,Harper Craig5,Igo William6,Sole Jeff7,Spiker Harry8,Tefft Brian9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA

2. Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, P.O. Box 996, Verona, Virginia 24482, USA

3. Division of Forestry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA

4. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110430, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA

5. Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA

6. West Virginia Department of Natural Resources, Route 2, Box 296G, Lewisburg, West Virginia 24901, USA

7. The Nature Conservancy, 642 West Main Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508, USA

8. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Mt. Nebo Wildlife Management Area, 1728 King's Run Road, Oakland, Maryland 21550, USA

9. Division of Fish and Wildlife, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, P.O. Box 218, West Kingston, Rhode Island 02892, USA

Abstract

Abstract From 1996 to 2001, researchers at 10 Appalachian study sites collected radiotracking data sufficient to delineate 1,054 seasonal home ranges of Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus; hereafter “grouse”). Using information-theoretic model selection and paired comparison of home ranges from individual grouse, we evaluated individual, local, and landscape factors hypothesized to affect grouse home-range size. Females and juvenile males occupied home ranges that averaged >2× larger than those of adult males, and home ranges of females averaged 2.6× larger during successful breeding seasons than during years of reproductive failure. Clearcuts and forest roads are considered high-quality covers, and both were more prevalent in smaller home ranges. Several factors operating at a regional and landscape scale were also important. Previous studies have reported that southern grouse use relatively large home ranges, and we observed a continuous decline in home-range size with increasing latitude across the 710-km range spanned by our study sites. Home-range size of males, particularly juvenile males, was positively related to an index of population density. Given the species' “dispersed lekking” mating system, we interpret this as evidence of competition for preferred display sites. As has been reported for other game birds, all sex and age classes of grouse used smaller home ranges following closure of sites to hunting. Grouse inhabiting oak-hickory forests used larger home ranges than conspecifics in mixed mesophytic forests, and other factors interacted with forest type. In oak-hickory forests, female home-range size was inversely related to use of mesic bottomlands, which support important forage plants, and home ranges of adult grouse increased 2.5× following poor hard-mast crops. By contrast, home ranges of grouse inhabiting mixed mesophytic forests were unrelated to use of bottomlands, and the influence of hard mast was reduced. This is in line with the view that in Appalachian oak-hickory forests, grouse are under strong nutritional constraint. However, this constraint is reduced in mixed mesophytic forests, likely because of the presence of high-quality alternative foods (e.g., cherry [Prunus spp.] and birch [Betula spp.]). Facteurs associés à une variation de la taille du domaine vital de Bonasa umbellus dans les Appalaches

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference78 articles.

1. Temporal patterns of spring space use by Ruffed Grouse.;Archibald;Journal of Wildlife Management,1975

2. Spatial relationships of neighboring male Ruffed Grouse in spring.;Archibald;Journal of Wildlife Management,1976

3. Ecological and behavioral correlates of variation in seasonal home ranges of wild turkeys.;Badyaev;Journal of Wildlife Management,1996

4. Adaptive Strategies and Population Ecology of Northern Grouse.;Bergerud,1988

5. Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America.;Braun,1950

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3