New approaches for testing non-inferiority for three-arm trials with Poisson distributed outcomes

Author:

Ghosh Samiran1,Paul Erina2,Chowdhury Shrabanti2,Tiwari Ram C.3

Affiliation:

1. Family Medicine & Public Health Sciences and Center of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University

2. Center of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University

3. Division of Biostatistics, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office Surveillance and Biometrics, FDA, USA

Abstract

Summary With the availability of limited resources, innovation for improved statistical method for the design and analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is of paramount importance for newer and better treatment discovery for any therapeutic area. Although clinical efficacy is almost always the primary evaluating criteria to measure any beneficial effect of a treatment, there are several important other factors (e.g., side effects, cost burden, less debilitating, less intensive, etc.), which can permit some less efficacious treatment options favorable to a subgroup of patients. This leads to non-inferiority (NI) testing. The objective of NI trial is to show that an experimental treatment is not worse than an active reference treatment by more than a pre-specified margin. Traditional NI trials do not include a placebo arm for ethical reason; however, this necessitates stringent and often unverifiable assumptions. On the other hand, three-arm NI trials consisting of placebo, reference, and experimental treatment, can simultaneously test the superiority of the reference over placebo and NI of experimental treatment over the reference. In this article, we proposed both novel Frequentist and Bayesian procedures for testing NI in the three-arm trial with Poisson distributed count outcome. RCTs with count data as the primary outcome are quite common in various disease areas such as lesion count in cancer trials, relapses in multiple sclerosis, dermatology, neurology, cardiovascular research, adverse event count, etc. We first propose an improved Frequentist approach, which is then followed by it’s Bayesian version. Bayesian methods have natural advantage in any active-control trials, including NI trial when substantial historical information is available for placebo and established reference treatment. In addition, we discuss sample size calculation and draw an interesting connection between the two paradigms.

Funder

PCORI

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,General Medicine,Statistics and Probability

Reference51 articles.

1. The nontruncated marginal of a truncated bivariate normal distribution;Arnold,;Psychometrika,1993

2. Likelihood ratio tests and intersection-union tests;Berger,,1997

3. Effect of disease-modifying drugs on cortical lesions and atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis;Calabrese,;Multiple Sclerosis Journal,2012

4. Approaches for testing non-inferiority in two-arm trial for risk ratio and odds ratio;Chowdhury,;Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics,2018

5. Non-inferiority testing for risk ratio, odds ratio and number needed to treat in three-arm trial;Chowdhury,;Computational Statistics & Data Analysis,2018

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3