Joint modeling in presence of informative censoring on the retrospective time scale with application to palliative care research

Author:

Wu Quran12,Daniels Michael34,El-Jawahri Areej5,Bakitas Marie6,Li Zhigang12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics , 2004 Mowry Rd , , Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA

2. University of Florida , 2004 Mowry Rd , , Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA

3. Department of Statistics , 102 Griffin-Floyd Hall , , Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

4. University of Florida , 102 Griffin-Floyd Hall , , Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

5. Department of Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital , 55 Fruit St , Boston, MA, 02114, USA

6. School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham , 1720 2nd Avenue South , Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA

Abstract

SummaryJoint modeling of longitudinal data such as quality of life data and survival data is important for palliative care researchers to draw efficient inferences because it can account for the associations between those two types of data. Modeling quality of life on a retrospective from death time scale is useful for investigators to interpret the analysis results of palliative care studies which have relatively short life expectancies. However, informative censoring remains a complex challenge for modeling quality of life on the retrospective time scale although it has been addressed for joint models on the prospective time scale. To fill this gap, we develop a novel joint modeling approach that can address the challenge by allowing informative censoring events to be dependent on patients’ quality of life and survival through a random effect. There are two sub-models in our approach: a linear mixed effect model for the longitudinal quality of life and a competing-risk model for the death time and dropout time that share the same random effect as the longitudinal model. Our approach can provide unbiased estimates for parameters of interest by appropriately modeling the informative censoring time. Model performance is assessed with a simulation study and compared with existing approaches. A real-world study is presented to illustrate the application of the new approach.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,General Medicine,Statistics and Probability

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3