Affiliation:
1. Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam , Potsdam 14469, Germany
2. Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development , Eberswalde 16225, Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Wildfires have recently destroyed large areas of forest in Central Europe. After a fire, the post-fire vegetation succession rebuilds previously lost biomass and carbon. Nevertheless, ground vegetation and tree regeneration, as well as belowground biomass, are largely neglected in allometric biomass models. Moreover, most models are calibrated for undisturbed forests, which differ from burned forests in terms of site conditions and species composition. We adapted a model using plant cover and shoot length of herb, graminoid and bryophyte species (PhytoCalc), and a single tree model using shoot length and root collar diameter of juvenile trees to estimate aboveground biomass (AGB) of post-fire species and growth groups, and extended them to estimate belowground biomass. We sampled the most dominant species from the herb and moss layer and the tree regeneration of burned and unburned Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests in NE Germany. We successfully calibrated post-fire vegetation models and showed that models for undisturbed forests from the literature mostly underestimate post-fire AGB. Using models from the literature for clear-cuts often improved the estimation of post-fire AGB, but still failed to estimate AGB accurately for some species. Inaccurate estimation of post-fire biomass with these other models can be explained by high irradiance and increased nutrient availability on burned sites, which affect tissue and wood density. We showed that own species- and growth group-specific allometric models calibrated to post-fire vegetation are required to correctly estimate the total (above- and belowground) biomass of post-fire vegetation needed to calculate carbon storage.
Funder
Waldklimafonds of the Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe
PYROPHOB project
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)