Mitigating the risk of wind damage at the forest landscape level by using stand neighbourhood and terrain elevation information in forest planning

Author:

Ruotsalainen Roope12ORCID,Pukkala Timo2,Ikonen Veli-Pekka2,Packalen Petteri3ORCID,Peltola Heli2

Affiliation:

1. Metsähallitus Forestry Ltd , Ratatie 11, PO Box 94, Vantaa FI-01301 , Finland

2. School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland , Yliopistokatu 7, PO Box 111, Joensuu FI-80101 , Finland

3. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Bioeconomy and Environment Unit , Latokartanonkaari 9, Helsinki FI-00790 , Finland

Abstract

Abstract Wind damage and the bark beetle outbreaks associated with it are major threats to non-declining, long-term wood production in boreal forests. We studied whether the risk of wind damage in a forested landscape could be decreased by using stand neighbourhood information in conjunction with terrain elevation information. A reference management plan minimized the differences in canopy height at stand boundaries and did not utilize information on the topography of the terrain, overlooking the possibility that the risk of windthrow may depend on the elevation of the terrain. Alternative management plans were developed by using four different weighting schemes when minimizing differences in canopy height at stand boundaries: (1) no weight (reference); (2) mean terrain elevation at the stand boundary; (3) deviation of the mean elevation of the boundary from the mean elevation of the terrain within a 100-m radius and (4) multipliers that described the effect of topography on wind speed at the stand boundary. For each management plan, we calculated the total number of at-risk trees and the total area of vulnerable stand edge. These statistics were based on the calculated critical wind speeds needed to uproot trees in stand edge zones. Minimization of the weighted mean of canopy height differences between adjacent stands resulted in homogeneous landscapes in terms of canopy height. Continuous cover management was often preferred instead of rotation management due to smaller canopy height differences between adjacent stands and its economical superiority. The best weighting scheme for calculating the mean canopy height difference between adjacent stands was the deviation between the mean elevation of the boundary and the mean elevation of the terrain within 100 m of the boundary. However, the differences between the weighting schemes were small. It was found that reasonably simple methods, based on a digital terrain model, a stand map, and the canopy heights of stands, could be used in forest planning to minimize the risk of wind damage. Validation against actual wind damages is required to assess the reliability of the results and to further develop the methodology presented.

Funder

Academy of Finland

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Forestry

Reference61 articles.

1. Coupling a tree growth model with storm damage modeling - conceptual approach and results of scenario simulations;Albrecht;Environ. Model Softw.,2015

2. Windthrow dynamics in boreal Ontario: a simulation of the vulnerability of several stand types across a range of wind speeds;Anyomi;Forest,2017

3. Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems;Bettinger;Silva Fenn.,2002

4. Potential climate change impacts on the probability of wind damage in a south Swedish forest;Blennow;Clim. Chang.,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3