Acceptability Study of Emotional Expressions of In-Vehicle Virtual Assistant

Author:

Kim Youngsang1ORCID,Yoo Hoonsik2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human-Artificial Intelligence Interaction, Sungkyunkwan University , 90321 International Hall, 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, Korea

2. Seoul Media Institute of Technology Department of Media Business, , 90321 International Hall, 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Abstract We analyzed the differences in drivers’ preferences for emotional expressions from an in-vehicle virtual assistant based on data collected from 823 respondents in five countries categorized into three different cultural settings: collectivism (Korea, China and Brazil), individualism (USA) and a mixture of both (Russia). To quantify the degree of acceptance, we used a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree) on four emotion types categorized based on Thayer’s two-dimensional emotion model. Analysis revealed that respondents in all five countries preferred emotion type 1 (pleased, happy, excited) and emotion type 4 (calm, peaceful, relaxed), that is, positive emotions under Thayer’s two-dimensional emotion model expressions, and they showed low acceptance for emotion type 2 (nervous, angry, annoying) and emotion type 3 (sad, bored, sleepy), negative emotional expressions. In a cross-cultural comparative analysis, Brazil and China ranked highest in both positive emotion types (1 and 4), and Korea ranked highest in negative emotion types.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference30 articles.

1. Affective interaction: How emotional agents affect users;Beale;International journal of human-computer studies,(2009)

2. Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent;Brave;International journal of human-computer studies,(2005)

3. Social identity and close relationships: What is the connection;Brewer,(2007)

4. Cultural context and psychological needs in Canada and Brazil: Testing a self-determination approach to the internalization of cultural practices, identity, and well-being;Chirkov;Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,(2005)

5. Family and Socialization Factors in Brazil: An Overview;Dessen;Online Readings in Psychology and Culture,(2002)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3