Predicting five-year interval second breast cancer risk in women with prior breast cancer

Author:

Hubbard Rebecca A1ORCID,Su Yu-Ru2ORCID,Bowles Erin J A2ORCID,Ichikawa Laura2ORCID,Kerlikowske Karla34ORCID,Lowry Kathryn P5ORCID,Miglioretti Diana L26ORCID,Tosteson Anna N A7ORCID,Wernli Karen J2ORCID,Lee Janie M5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, PA, USA

2. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington , Seattle, WA, USA

3. Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California , San Francisco, CA, USA

4. General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of California , San Francisco, CA, USA

5. Department of Radiology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center , Seattle, WA, USA

6. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis , Davis, CA, USA

7. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Dartmouth Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Lebanon, NH, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Annual surveillance mammography is recommended for women with a personal history of breast cancer. Risk prediction models that estimate mammography failures such as interval second breast cancers could help to tailor surveillance imaging regimens to women’s individual risk profiles. Methods In a cohort of women with a history of breast cancer receiving surveillance mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium in 1996-2019, we used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)-penalized regression to estimate the probability of an interval second cancer (invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ) in the 1 year after a negative surveillance mammogram. Based on predicted risks from this one-year risk model, we generated cumulative risks of an interval second cancer for the five-year period after each mammogram. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation in the overall cohort and within race and ethnicity strata. Results In 173 290 surveillance mammograms, we observed 496 interval cancers. One-year risk models were well-calibrated (expected/observed ratio = 1.00) with good accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.64). Model performance was similar across race and ethnicity groups. The median five-year cumulative risk was 1.20% (interquartile range 0.93%-1.63%). Median five-year risks were highest in women who were under age 40 or pre- or perimenopausal at diagnosis and those with estrogen receptor-negative primary breast cancers. Conclusions Our risk model identified women at high risk of interval second breast cancers who may benefit from additional surveillance imaging modalities. Risk models should be evaluated to determine if risk-guided supplemental surveillance imaging improves early detection and decreases surveillance failures.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3