Executing plans to enhance diversity across cancer centers in the United States: opportunities and challenges

Author:

Li Christopher I12ORCID,Rogers Sherise Chantell3,Bult Carol J4ORCID,Guerra Carmen E5,Talton Angela6,Williams Lovoria B7,Law Wendy12

Affiliation:

1. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center , Seattle, WA, USA

2. Fred Hutch/University of Washington/Seattle Children’s Cancer Consortium , Seattle, WA, USA

3. University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, USA

4. The Jackson Laboratory , Bar Harbor, ME, USA

5. Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, USA

6. City of Hope , Duarte, CA, USA

7. University of Kentucky College of Nursing & Markey Comprehensive Cancer Center , Lexington, KY, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Lack of diversity in the cancer research workforce persists, which the new requirement for all National Cancer Institute (NCI)–designated cancer centers to have a Plan to Enhance Diversity (PED) seeks to address. However, it is not well understood how different cancer centers are approaching the development and execution of these plans. Our objective was to assess how cancer centers are establishing and pursuing their PED. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of members of the Cancer Center Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Network, which includes all NCI-designated cancer centers and several emerging centers. A total of 62 cancer centers (75% of those invited), including 58 NCI-designated cancer centers (81% of those with this designation), participated and completed a questionnaire that assessed PED leadership, major challenges, implementation strategies, and approach to evaluate PED progress. Results The most common PED challenge identified is recruiting diverse faculty (68% of centers), and the most common strategy currently used to address this is reviewing and revising faculty recruitment practices (67%). The most common approach centers are using to measure PED progress is shifts in demographics (68%), and data on the demographics of faculty, leadership, and trainees are available at 79%, 81%, and 75% of centers, respectively. Conclusions Almost all centers have established a PED leadership structure, however, there is considerable variation in the approaches used to realize PED goals and in the resources provided to support PED work. Realizing opportunities to share and implement common best practices and exemplar programs has the potential to elevate the impact of PED efforts nationally.

Funder

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference17 articles.

1. Leadership diversity and development in the nation’s cancer centers;Lerman;J Natl Cancer Inst,2022

2. Trends in US cancer and heart disease mortality, 1999-2018;Avery;Circulation,2021

3. AACR cancer disparities progress report 2022;Williams;Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2022

4. Diversity makes you brighter;Levine;New York Times.,2015

5. Collaboration: strength in diversity;Freeman;Nature,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3