Evaluating the sensitivity of EQ-5D-5L in patients with brain metastases: a secondary analysis of NRG CC001

Author:

Cherng Hua-Ren R1ORCID,Qu Melody2,Zafari Zafar3ORCID,Bentzen Søren M4,Armstrong Terri S5ORCID,Gondi Vinai6,Brown Paul D7,Mehta Minesh8,Mishra Mark V9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center , Baltimore, MD, USA

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Centre , London, ON, Canada

3. Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , Baltimore, MD, USA

4. Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, USA

5. Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research , Bethesda, MD, USA

6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center and Proton Center , Warrenville, IL, USA

7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, USA

8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida , Miami, FL, USA

9. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L is a commonly used measure of health-related quality of life in clinical trials given the use of its index score as a measure of health utilities. It is unclear whether EQ-5D-5L is sensitive to changes in neurocognitive function and progression that occur following brain radiation. This study sought to evaluate the sensitivity of EQ-5D-5L in reflecting these changes. Methods A secondary analysis of NRG Oncology CC001 was performed. Mean EQ-5D-5L index and visual analog scale (VAS) score changes from baseline between groups of patients stratified by neurocognitive function and intracranial progression status were assessed. MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) symptom and interference items were also analyzed between groups. Results EQ-5D-5L mean index and VAS score changes between patients who had cognitive failure and those who had preserved cognition showed no statistically significant differences at any timepoint. In contrast, VAS changes at 4 months (1.61 vs -5.13, P = .05) and 6 months (8.17 vs −0.14, P = .04) were significantly improved in the patients who survived without intracranial progression. MDASI-BT cognitive factor scores were improved in the cohort of patients with preserved neurocognitive function at 2 months (1.68 vs 2.08, P = .05) and 4 months (1.35 vs 1.83, P = .04). MDASI-BT symptom interference was significantly associated with intracranial progression at 4 months, but not with neurocognitive status. Conclusion EQ-5D-5L index and VAS scores were not sensitive to neurocognitive changes that patients experienced, but VAS scores were sensitive to progression. This study challenges the routine use of EQ-5D as a quality of life metric in brain metastases clinical trials that are focused on preventing neurocognitive dysfunction. Trial Registration NCT# 02360215.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference33 articles.

1. Including patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported resource-use questionnaires in studies;Bresnahan;Acad Radiol,2014

2. Collecting patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials;Kuehn;JAMA,2021

3. Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives—a systematic review;Silveira;Health Qual Life Outcomes,2022

4. Patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: measuring symptomatic adverse events with the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE);Kluetz;Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book,2016

5. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs);Weldring;Health Serv Insights,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3