Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Chow Ronald123ORCID,Midroni Julie1,Kaur Jagdeep2,Boldt Gabriel2,Liu Geoffrey1ORCID,Eng Lawson1,Liu Fei-Fei1ORCID,Haibe-Kains Benjamin1,Lock Michael2,Raman Srinivas1

Affiliation:

1. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, Canada

2. London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario , London, ON, Canada

3. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) for cancer clinical trial enrollment and its predictive accuracy in identifying eligible patients for inclusion in such trials.MethodsDatabases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched until June 2022. Articles were included if they reported on AI actively being used in the clinical trial enrollment process. Narrative synthesis was conducted among all extracted data: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. For studies where the 2x2 contingency table could be calculated or supplied by authors, a meta-analysis to calculate summary statistics was conducted using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve model.ResultsTen articles reporting on more than 50 000 patients in 19 datasets were included. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity exceeded 80% in all but 1 dataset. Positive predictive value exceeded 80% in 5 of 17 datasets. Negative predictive value exceeded 80% in all datasets. Summary sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70.9% to 97.4%); summary specificity was 99.3% (95% CI = 81.8% to 99.9%).ConclusionsAI demonstrated comparable, if not superior, performance to manual screening for patient enrollment into cancer clinical trials. As well, AI is highly efficient, requiring less time and human resources to screen patients. AI should be further investigated and implemented for patient recruitment into cancer clinical trials. Future research should validate the use of AI for clinical trials enrollment in less resource-rich regions and ensure broad inclusion for generalizability to all sexes, ages, and ethnicities.

Funder

CARO-CROF Pamela Catton Summer Studentship Award

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference30 articles.

1. Measuring the impact of academic cancer network development on clinical integration, quality of care, and patient satisfaction;Chiang;J Oncol Pract,2018

2. Effects of quality of treatment on prognosis in primary breast cancer patients treated in daily practice;Ottevanger;Anticancer Res,2002

3. Adult cancer clinical trials that fail to complete: an epidemic?;Stensland;J Natl Cancer Inst,2014

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3