A Systematic Review of Estimating Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Population Level With Administrative Data

Author:

Izci Hava1ORCID,Tambuyzer Tim2,Tuand Krizia3ORCID,Depoorter Victoria1ORCID,Laenen Annouschka4ORCID,Wildiers Hans15ORCID,Vergote Ignace16ORCID,Van Eycken Liesbet2,De Schutter Harlinde2,Verdoodt Freija2ORCID,Neven Patrick16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

2. Research Department, Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium

3. KU Leuven Libraries - 2Bergen - Learning Centre Désiré Collen, Leuven, Belgium

4. Interuniversity Centre for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Leuven, Belgium

5. Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

6. Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundExact numbers of breast cancer recurrences are currently unknown at the population level, because they are challenging to actively collect. Previously, real-world data such as administrative claims have been used within expert- or data-driven (machine learning) algorithms for estimating cancer recurrence. We present the first systematic review and meta-analysis, to our knowledge, of publications estimating breast cancer recurrence at the population level using algorithms based on administrative data.MethodsThe systematic literature search followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We evaluated and compared sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of algorithms. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model to obtain a pooled estimate of accuracy.ResultsSeventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. Most articles used information from medical files as the gold standard, defined as any recurrence. Two studies included bone metastases only in the definition of recurrence. Fewer studies used a model-based approach (decision trees or logistic regression) (41.2%) compared with studies using detection rules without specified model (58.8%). The generalized linear mixed model for all recurrence types reported an accuracy of 92.2% (95% confidence interval = 88.4% to 94.8%).ConclusionsPublications reporting algorithms for detecting breast cancer recurrence are limited in number and heterogeneous. A thorough analysis of the existing algorithms demonstrated the need for more standardization and validation. The meta-analysis reported a high accuracy overall, which indicates algorithms as promising tools to identify breast cancer recurrence at the population level. The rule-based approach combined with emerging machine learning algorithms could be interesting to explore in the future.

Funder

VZW THINK-PINK

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3