Racial disparities in diagnostic evaluation of uterine cancer among Medicaid beneficiaries

Author:

Xu Xiao12ORCID,Chen Ling3,Nunez-Smith Marcella4,Clark Mitchell1,Wright Jason D3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA

2. Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons , New York, NY, USA

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background To inform reasons contributing to Black-White disparity in early diagnosis of uterine cancer, we compared the quality of diagnostic evaluation received by Black vs White patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) ultimately diagnosed with uterine cancer. Methods Using 2008-2019 MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database, we identified Black (n = 858) and White (n = 1749) patients with uterine cancer presenting with AUB. Quality of diagnostic evaluation was measured by delayed diagnosis (>1 year after AUB reporting), not receiving guideline-recommended diagnostic procedures, delayed time to first diagnostic procedure (>2 months after AUB reporting), number of diagnostic procedures received, and number of evaluation and management visits for AUB. The association between race and quality indicators was examined by multivariable regressions adjusting for patient characteristics. Results Black patients were more likely than White patients to experience delayed diagnosis (11.3% vs 8.3%, P = .01; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 2.29) or to not receive guideline-recommended diagnostic procedures (10.1% vs 5.0%, P < .001; adjusted OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.40 to 2.68). Even when they did receive recommended diagnostic procedures, Black patients were more likely than White patients to experience delay in time to the first diagnostic procedure (adjusted OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.97). In addition, Black patients underwent more evaluation and management visits for AUB before getting diagnosed compared with White patients (adjusted mean ratio = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.23). Conclusions Black and White patients with uterine cancer differed in the quality of diagnostic evaluation received. Improving equity in this area may help reduce Black-White disparity in stage at diagnosis.

Funder

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference32 articles.

1. Cancer progress and priorities: uterine cancer;Felix;Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2018

2. Cancer statistics, 2019;Siegel;CA Cancer J Clin,2019

3. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 1: national cancer statistics;Islami;J Natl Cancer Inst,2021

4. Endometrial cancer;Lu;N Engl J Med,2020

5. The changing landscape of gynecologic cancer mortality in the United States;Giaquinto;Obstet Gynecol,2022

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3