Comprehensive analysis of germline drivers in endometrial cancer
Author:
Gordhandas Sushmita1, Rios-Doria Eric1, Cadoo Karen A2, Catchings Amanda3ORCID, Maio Anna4, Kemel Yelena4ORCID, Sheehan Margaret3, Ranganathan Megha3ORCID, Green Dina3, Aryamvally Anjali3, Arnold Angela G3, Salo-Mullen Erin3, Manning-Geist Beryl1, Sia Tiffany1, Selenica Pier5, Da Cruz Paula Arnaud1, Vanderbilt Chad5, Misyura Maksym5, Leitao Mario M16, Mueller Jennifer J16, Makker Vicky37, Rubinstein Maria37, Friedman Claire F37, Zhou Qin8, Iasonos Alexia8, Latham Alicia37, Carlo Maria I37, Murciano-Goroff Yonina R37, Will Marie37, Walsh Michael F37, Issa Bhaloo Shirin5, Ellenson Lora H5, Ceyhan-Birsoy Ozge5ORCID, Berger Michael F5, Robson Mark E37, Abu-Rustum Nadeem16, Aghajanian Carol37, Offit Kenneth37ORCID, Stadler Zsofia37, Weigelt Britta5ORCID, Mandelker Diana L5, Liu Ying L37ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA 2. St. James’s Hospital, Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute , Dublin, Ireland 3. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA 4. Sloan Kettering Institute , New York, NY, USA 5. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College , New York, NY, USA 7. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College , New York, NY, USA 8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundWe sought to determine the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in unselected patients with endometrial cancer (EC), define biallelic gPVs within tumors, and describe their associations with clinicopathologic features.MethodsGermline assessment of at least 76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing clinical tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering–Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) sequencing from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021. In patients with gPVs, biallelic alterations in ECs were identified through analysis of loss of heterozygosity and somatic PVs. Clinicopathologic variables were compared using nonparametric tests.ResultsOf 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs, and 15 patients had 2 gPVs. There were 231 gPVs in 35 genes (75 [32%] high penetrance; 39 [17%] moderate penetrance; and 117 [51%] low, recessive, or uncertain penetrance). Compared with those without gPVs, patients with gPVs were younger (P = .002), more often White (P = .009), and less obese (P = .025) and had differences in distribution of tumor histology (P = .017) and molecular subtype (P < .001). Among 231 gPVs, 74 (32%) exhibited biallelic inactivation within tumors. For high-penetrance gPVs, 63% (47 of 75) of ECs had biallelic alterations, primarily affecting mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination related genes, including BRCA1,BRCA2, RAD51D, and PALB2. Biallelic inactivation varied across molecular subtypes with highest rates in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or copy-number (CN)–high subtypes (3 of 12 [25%] POLE, 30 of 77 [39%] MSI-H, 27 of 60 [45%] CN-high, 9 of 57 [16%] CN-low; P < .001).ConclusionsOf unselected patients with EC, 13% had gPVs, with 63% of gPVs in high-penetrance genes (MMR and homologous recombination) exhibiting biallelic inactivation, potentially driving cancer development. This supports germline assessment in EC given implications for treatment and cancer prevention.
Funder
National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Cancer Center Robert and Kate Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics Cycle for Survival and Breast Cancer Research Foundation
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|