Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Cell Therapy for Perinatal Brain Injury

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionWe have previously described preclinical literature which supports umbilical cord blood-derived cell (UCBC) therapy as an efficacious treatment for perinatal brain injury. However, efficacy of UCBCs may be influenced by different patient population and intervention characteristics.ObjectivesTo systematically review the effects of UCBCs on brain outcomes in animal models of perinatal brain injury across subgroups to better understand the contribution of model type (preterm versus term), brain injury type, UCB cell type, route of administration, timing of intervention, cell dosage, and number of doses.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed to identify studies using UCBC therapy in animal models of perinatal brain injury. Subgroup differences were measured by chi2 test where possible.ResultsDifferential benefits of UCBCs were seen across a number of subgroup analyses including intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) vs. hypoxia ischemia (HI) model (apoptosis white matter (WM): chi2 = 4.07; P = .04, neuroinflammation-TNF-α: chi2 = 5.99; P = .01), UCB-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) vs. UCB-derived mononuclear cells (MNCs) (oligodendrocyte WM: chi2 = 5.01; P = .03, neuroinflammation-TNF-α: chi2 = 3.93; P = .05, apoptosis grey matter (GM), astrogliosis WM), and intraventricular/intrathecal vs. systemic routes of administration (microglial activation GM: chi2 = 7.51; P = .02, astrogliosis WM: chi2 = 12.44; P = .002). We identified a serious risk of bias and overall low certainty of evidence.ConclusionsPreclinical evidence suggests UCBCs to show greater efficacy in the injury model of IVH compared to HI, the use of UCB-MSCs compared to UCB-MNCs and the use of local administrative routes compared to systemic routes in animal models of perinatal brain injury. Further research is needed to improve certainty of evidence and address knowledge gaps.