Calling in “Sick”: COVID-19, Opportunism, Pretext, and Subnational Autocratization

Author:

Stenberg Matthew1ORCID,Rocco Philip2ORCID,Farole Safia Abukar3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Berkeley, USA

2. Marquette University, USA

3. Portland State University, USA

Abstract

Abstract As governments sought to manage the coronavirus pandemic, many pursed temporary increases in centralized authority, a general tactic of crisis management. However, in some countries, public health was not the only motive for centralization. The COVID-19 response coincided with broader worldwide trends toward autocratization. Some of these efforts happened while the world was preoccupied with responding to the pandemic without concretely referencing coronavirus; however, in other cases, public-health rationales are clearly and explicitly invoked as a pretext for actions that instead aid the consolidation of regime authority. This has been especially pernicious in subnational politics, where efforts have been made to undermine the ability of opposition parties to fairly contest local and regional politics. This article examines four cases in which political actors either opportunistically used distraction from the COVID-19 pandemic or explicitly invoked public health while seeking to undermine long-term political contestation in their jurisdictions: Hong Kong, Hungary, Uganda, and the United States. We characterize the use of pandemic response as pretext or opportunity for undermining opposition parties, recentralizing political authority in dominant actors, and inhibiting the fair contestation of elections.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference111 articles.

1. Quasi-State of Emergency: Assessing the Constitutionality of Ghana's Legislative Response to Covid-19;Addadzi-Koom;The Theory and Practice of Legislation,2020

2. Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19;Adolph;Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law,2021

3. Gen Muntu Blocked from Campaigning in Entebbe;Adude,2020

4. Investor Distraction and Managerial Attention – International Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions;Ahmad,2021

5. Internet Shutdowns in Uganda Cannot Prevent Political Resistance;Anguyo,2021

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3