How the World Bank Engages with the Sustainable Development Goal on Reducing Inequalities: A Case of Organizational Jiu-Jitsu

Author:

van Driel Melanie1ORCID,Biermann Frank2ORCID,Vijge Marjanneke J3ORCID,Kim Rakhyun E4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. PhD Researcher for the GlobalGoals Project at the Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development at Utrecht University , The Netherlands

2. Research Professor of Global Sustainability Governance at the Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development at Utrecht University , The Netherlands

3. Assistant Professor of Sustainability Governance in the Developing World at the Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development at Utrecht University , The Netherlands

4. Associate Professor of Global Environmental Governance at the Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development at Utrecht University , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract In 2015, the United Nations agreed on seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to mobilize various actors, including international organizations, for a global transformation toward sustainability. The expectation was that international organizations would assist in the implementation of the goals and encourage, support, or coordinate others to work toward their achievement. But have international organizations over the last 8 years changed their behavior because of the SDGs? We present an in-depth examination of how the World Bank, an influential international organization with a broad development mandate, has engaged with the SDGs, especially with SDG 10 that seeks to reduce inequalities. Based on a mixed-method approach that included the study of 326 key documents and 23 interviews, we found no evidence of a policy impact of the SDGs on the World Bank. Instead, we conclude that the World Bank’s engagement with the SDGs can best be described as “organizational jiu-jitsu,” mobilizing the metaphor of the ancient martial art in which an actor uses the force and strength of the opponent to advance one’s own position. We argue that the World Bank used the growing momentum of the SDGs to further its strategic objectives without being influenced by the SDGs in turn. The bank engaged with the SDGs selectively; efforts to integrate the goals into organizational practices remained limited; and their inclusion in country-level processes is primarily voluntary. These findings, which may be similar for other powerful international organizations, raise important questions about the ability of global goal-setting to realize a transformative impact.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference90 articles.

1. Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance;Abbott;International Organization,2016

2. The Diffusion of International Norms: A Field Experiment on the Role of Common Knowledge;Arias,2015

3. Inequality

4. Paradigm and Nexus: Neoclassical Economics and the Growth Imperative in the World Bank, 1948–2000;Bentley;Review of International Political Economy,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3