Author:
Ferdinandusse Ward,Whiting Alex
Abstract
Abstract
A central aim of international criminal tribunals since Nuremberg has been to prosecute those most responsible, the ‘big fish’, leaving smaller cases to national jurisdictions. The authors, who have both academic backgrounds as well as experience prosecuting international crimes in both international and domestic courts, argue that the International Criminal Court (ICC) should change course and expand its focus to include more ‘little fish cases’, bringing more cases overall and initiating them more quickly. Particular features of the ICC, namely its global reach and its ambition to promote national prosecutions, compel this change in strategy. For normative, strategic, and practical reasons, the ICC should bring smaller fish cases to enhance its credibility, functioning, and legitimacy, and to spur prosecutions by national authorities.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Atrocity’s Glass Booth;Current Legal Problems;2024-04-27
2. Fairness and the Goals of International Criminal Trials;2023-03-27
3. Introduction;Fairness and the Goals of International Criminal Trials;2023-03-27