Affiliation:
1. School of Humanities, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
Abstract
Abstract
The notion of the Anthropocene has become an instrumental backdrop against which post-foundational social theory and political research frame political action in a way that defies modern certainty and, somewhat paradoxically, anthropocentrism, under conditions of drastic ecological changes. But what exactly is the theoretical promise of the Anthropocene? This paper seeks to explore what the concept can offer to critical social science and, conversely, how these critical approaches define and locate the analytical and the political purchase of the Anthropocene, through the critical lens of Indigenous scholarship. The paper genealogically retraces the transition from a science-led, discontinuous-descriptive to a continuous-ontological conceptualization of the Anthropocene. It then unpacks how the notions of ecological relationality and non-human agency deployed in the latter closely parallel certain lines of argumentation in Indigenous thought and politics. Drawing on critical Indigenous studies, the paper formulates a critique of how relational perspectives enfold alternative ontologies and politics within an overarching Anthropocene ontology that is not only problematically universalizing, but also replaces the genuine engagement with differences and resistance.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference68 articles.
1. Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge;Agrawal;Development and Change,1995
2. The Practice of Kuleana: Reflections on Critical Indigenous Studies through Trans-Indigenous Exchange;Aikau,2016
3. Trans-Indigenous
4. Critical Indigenous Studies: From Difference to Density;Andersen;Cultural Studies Review,2009
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献