Survival of conventionally bonded mandibular retainers with or without enamel sandblasting in orthodontic patients over a 12-month period. A single-centre, split-mouth randomized clinical trial

Author:

Laspos Christodoulos12,Seehra Jadbinder3ORCID,Katsaros Christos4,Pandis Nikolaos4

Affiliation:

1. Private Practice , Limassol , Cyprus

2. Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus , Nicosia , Cyprus

3. Centre for Craniofacial Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London , UK

4. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dental School/Medical Faculty, University of Bern , Switzerland

Abstract

Summary Background The aim of this trial was to assess the effect of enamel sandblasting in addition to the acid-etch technique in reducing first-time failures of fixed mandibular retainers placed over a 12-month period. Materials and methods Ethical approval was obtained. Participants were recruited in a single private practice. The primary outcome of this study was any first-time failure of the mandibular fixed retainer assessed at three timepoints over a 12-month period. Three consecutive teeth either on the left or right side (from lower canine-lower central incisor) were randomly allocated to the intervention (sandblasting) and the control (non-sandblasted). Randomization was performed using a centralized randomization service. The patients were randomized in blocks of four and eight with allocation concealment secured by contacting the sequence generator for group assignment. Blinding of either the patient or clinicians was not possible at time of placement of the mandibular retainer. Results One hundred and ninety-seven participants were randomized to receive enamel sandblasting (intervention) and non-sandblasting (control) in the region of the six anterior mandibular teeth in a split-mouth fashion. Participants were recruited between December 2018 to October 2020. The data for all participants were analysed resulting in 394 observations. Overall, the risk of first-time failure was 11.4%. No difference in first-time failures was observed between the intervention (sandblasting) and control (non-sandblasting) groups [hazard ratio (HR), 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59, 1.88, P = 0.88]. Males had a higher instant probability of first-time failures (HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.65–6.14; P < 0.01). Participants with a fair level of co-operation had a lower instant probability of first-time failures (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.86; P = 0.02). There were no harms reported to either the participant or their dentition. Conclusions No difference in the first-time failures of mandibular bonded retainers placed with conventional etch-bond technique with or without enamel sandblasting was observed. The overall risk of first-time failure was 11.4%. Registration This trial was not registered prior to trial commencement.

Funder

Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Orthodontics

Reference31 articles.

1. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention;Sadowsky;American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,1994

2. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention;Little;American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,1988

3. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures;Padmos;American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2018

4. Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers;Booth;American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2008

5. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers;Renkema;American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2011

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3