The advantage of the right in social media news sharing

Author:

González-Bailón Sandra1ORCID,d'Andrea Valeria2ORCID,Freelon Deen3,De Domenico Manlio24ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

2. Complex Multilayer Networks Lab, Center for Digital Society, Fondazione Bruno Kessler , Trento 38123, Italy

3. Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA

4. Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Padua , Padova 35131, Italy

Abstract

Abstract We analyze social media activity during one of the largest protest mobilizations in US history to examine ideological asymmetries in the posting of news content. Using an unprecedented combination of four datasets (tracking offline protests, social media activity, web browsing, and the reliability of news sources), we show that there is no evidence of unreliable sources having any prominent visibility during the protest period, but we do identify asymmetries in the ideological slant of the sources shared on social media, with a clear bias towards right-leaning domains. These results support the “amplification of the right” thesis, which points to the structural conditions (social and technological) that lead to higher visibility of content with a partisan bent towards the right. Our findings provide evidence that right-leaning sources gain more visibility on social media and reveal that ideological asymmetries manifest themselves even in the context of movements with progressive goals.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference33 articles.

1. Black lives matter may be the largest movement in U.S. history;Buchanan,2020

2. Beyond the hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the online struggle for offline justice;Freelon,2016

3. #HashtagActivism

4. False equivalencies: online activism from left to right;Freelon;Science,2020

5. Pandemics, protests, and publics: demographic activity and engagement on Twitter in 2020;Shugars;J Quant Descr Digit Media,2021

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3