The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making

Author:

Capraro Valerio1ORCID,Lentsch Austin2ORCID,Acemoglu Daron3ORCID,Akgun Selin4,Akhmedova Aisel4,Bilancini Ennio5ORCID,Bonnefon Jean-François6ORCID,Brañas-Garza Pablo7ORCID,Butera Luigi8ORCID,Douglas Karen M9ORCID,Everett Jim A C9ORCID,Gigerenzer Gerd10ORCID,Greenhow Christine4,Hashimoto Daniel A111,Holt-Lunstad Julianne12ORCID,Jetten Jolanda13ORCID,Johnson Simon14,Kunz Werner H15ORCID,Longoni Chiara16ORCID,Lunn Pete17,Natale Simone18ORCID,Paluch Stefanie19ORCID,Rahwan Iyad20ORCID,Selwyn Neil21ORCID,Singh Vivek22ORCID,Suri Siddharth23ORCID,Sutcliffe Jennifer4,Tomlinson Joe24ORCID,van der Linden Sander25ORCID,Van Lange Paul A M26ORCID,Wall Friederike27ORCID,Van Bavel Jay J2829ORCID,Viale Riccardo3031ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca , Milan 20126 , Italy

2. Department of Economics, MIT , Cambridge, MA 02142 , USA

3. Institute Professor and Department of Economics, MIT , Cambridge, MA 02142 , USA

4. College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

5. IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca , Lucca 55100 , Italy

6. Toulouse School of Economics , Toulouse 31000, France

7. , Loyola Andalucia University Loyola Behavioral Lab , Córdoba 41740, Spain

8. Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School , Frederiksberg 2000, Denmark

9. School of Psychology, University of Kent , Canterbury CT27NP, UK

10. Max Planck Institute for Human Development , Berlin 14195 , Germany

11. Department of Computer and Information Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6309, USA

12. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Brigham Young University , Provo, UT 84602 , USA

13. School of Psychology, University of Queensland , St Lucia, QLD 4067 , Australia

14. School of Management, MIT Sloan School of Management , Cambridge, MA 02142 , USA

15. Department of Marketing, University of Massachusetts Boston , Boston, MA 02125, USA

16. Department of Marketing, Bocconi University , Milan 20136, Italy

17. Behavioural Research Unit, Economic & Social Research Institute , Dublin D02 K138 , Ireland

18. Department of Humanities, University of Turin , Turin 10125 , Italy

19. Department of Service and Technology Marketing, Aarhus University , Aarhus 8000, Denmark

20. Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development , Berlin 14195 , Germany

21. Faculty of Education, Monash University , Clayton VIC 3168 , Australia

22. Penn Computer Assisted Surgery and Outcomes Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

23. Microsoft Research , Redmond, WA 98502 , USA

24. York Law School , University of York, York YO105DD, UK

25. Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB 21TN, UK

26. Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit , Amsterdam 1081HV , The Netherlands

27. Department of Management Control and Strategic Management, University of Klagenfurt , Klagenfurt am Wörthersee 9020, Austria

28. Department of Psychology & Center for Neural Science, New York University , New York, NY 10012, USA

29. Norwegian School of Economics , Bergen 5045 , Norway

30. CISEPS, University of Milan-Bicocca , Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milan 20126 , Italy

31. Herbert Simon Society , Turin 10122 , Italy

Abstract

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section, we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.

Funder

Hewlett Foundation

NSF

Schmidt Sciences

Google

Sloan Foundation

Smith Richardson Foundation

Washington Center for Equitable Growth

Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

European Research Council

ESRC

Leverhulme Trust

Australian Research Council

Sloan School

MIT

University of Turin

Ammodo science award

Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Google Jigsaw

Center for Conflict and Cooperation

Templeton World Charity Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference160 articles.

1. The information age: evolution or revolution;Kranzberg;Inform Technol Soc Tansf,1985

2. So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy;Dwivedi;Int J Inf Manage.,2023

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3