Affiliation:
1. Quantitative Social Science, Dartmouth College , Hanover, NH 03755 , USA
2. Computer Science, Barnard College , New York, NY 10027 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
The 2024 Taiwanese Presidential Election is not just a critical geopolitical event, it also engages with themes of alternative candidacy, foreign policy, and affective polarization. At one point, a four-candidate race had emerged in a traditionally bipartisan election, with alternative candidates disrupting the dichotomy of Chinese vs. Taiwanese identity. Leveraging 911,510 posts and 101,600,047 engagements on social media, we analyze user discourse and engagement. First, we find traditional candidates derive more engagement on foreign policy and geopolitical issues, alternative candidates on domestic issues. Additionally, virality is generated by affective reasons, although in-group references generate more engagement than out-group references. Lastly, a puzzle is revealed where alternative candidates draw more homogeneous attention from national identity groups. Results suggest alternative candidacy can be generated by both positive and negative comparisons rooted in national identity.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference42 articles.
1. How are people feeling in the most dangerous place on earth?;Rigger;Brookings Institute,2021
2. Public diplomacy arguments and Taiwan;Hollihan;J Public Diplomacy,2023
3. 台灣2024總統大選: 藍白合為何破局? 趙少康及吳欣盈參戰 郭台銘宣佈退選 (Taiwan’s 2024 Presidential Election: why did the blue-white alliance break?);Lu;BBC,2023
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献