Development and Validation of a Telephone Questionnaire to Characterize Lymphedema in Women Treated for Breast Cancer

Author:

Norman Sandra A1,Miller Linda T2,Erikson H Bernadette3,Norman M Frank4,McCorkle Ruth5

Affiliation:

1. SA Norman, PhD, is Research Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 801 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021 (USA).

2. LT Miller, PT, BS, BA, is Clinical Director, Breast Cancer Physical Therapy Center, Philadelphia, Pa

3. HB Erikson, PT, BS, BA, is Physical Therapist, Penn Therapy and Fitness, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa

4. MF Norman, PhD, is Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa

5. R McCorkle, RN, PhD, is Professor, School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Conn

Abstract

Abstract Background and Purpose. Accurate and economical characterization of lymphedema is needed for population-based studies of incidence and risk. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a telephone questionnaire for characterizing lymphedema. Subjects. Forty-three women who were treated previously for breast cancer and who were recruited from physical therapy practices and a cancer support organization were studied. Methods. Questionnaire assessment of the presence and degree of lymphedema was compared with physical therapists' diagnoses, based primarily on circumferential measurements. Twenty-five of the 43 subjects were measured independently by 2 physical therapists to assess interobserver agreement. Results. Interobserver agreement on clinical assessments of the presence and degree of lymphedema was high (20/25, weighted kappa=.80); all of the disagreements were between judgments of whether there was no lymphedema or mild lymphedema. For the diagnosis of at least moderate lymphedema (differential in the circumferences of the upper extremities greater than 2 cm), sensitivity of the questionnaire varied from 0.86 to 0.92 and specificity was 0.90. However, sensitivity (varying from 0.93 to 0.96) was higher than specificity (varying from 0.69 to 0.75) for the diagnosis of any lymphedema. Discussion and Conclusion. A few straightforward questions exhibited excellent agreement with physical therapists' assessments for identifying at least moderate lymphedema.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3