Development and feasibility testing of an evidence-based training programme for pharmacist independent prescribers responsible for the medicines-related activities within care homes

Author:

Wright David J1ORCID,Blyth Annie1,Maskrey Vivienne2,Norris Nigel3,Bond Christine M4ORCID,Hughes Carmel M5,Alldred David P67,Holland Richard C8,

Affiliation:

1. School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK

2. School of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK

3. School of Education, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK

4. General Practice & Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

5. School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK

6. School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

7. Yorkshire and Humber NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre/University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

8. Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The UK pharmacists with independent prescribing rights (pharmacist independent prescribers [PIPs]) are authorised to prescribe within their areas of competence. To enable PIPs to provide pharmaceutical care to residents in care homes and assume responsibility for medicines management, a process for development and assessment of competence is required. The aim of this research was to develop a training and accreditation process (training programme) to enable PIPs to operate safely and effectively within care homes. Methods Located in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland across four sites and based on a systematic review, it consisted of four phases: (1) initial stakeholder engagement, (2) uni-professional focus groups and interviews, (3) expert panel consensus and (4) feasibility testing. Four PIPs were trained each to provide pharmaceutical care to 10 care home residents. An expert panel synthesised the evidence at each stage to develop each iteration of the training programme. Content analysis was used throughout. Results Differences in baseline knowledge of PIPs required inclusion of a Personal Development Framework and the provision of a mentor. Face-to-face training focussed on managing medicines for a complex older person, minimising prescribing costs and supporting people without capacity. Provision of time to understand local context and develop relationships with care homes and general practitioners was identified as a central requirement. PIPs were assessed for competency via viva. Feasibility testing demonstrated that the derived training programme was acceptable, practical and effective. Discussion The model seemed to work, but due to small numbers, larger-scale testing of the training programme is now required.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3