Critical care pharmacist research activity, experience and interests: a 2021 United Kingdom survey

Author:

Jennings Jennifer K1ORCID,McKenzie Cathrine23ORCID,Gondongwe Xolani D4ORCID,Bourne Richard S15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pharmacy and Critical Care, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Sheffield , UK

2. School of Medicine, University of Southampton, NIHR, Biomedical Research Centre, Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care theme and NIHR Wessex Applied Research Collaborative (ARC) , Southampton , UK

3. Pharmacy and Critical Care, University Hospital Southampton , Southampton , UK

4. Critical Care, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK

5. Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Research and innovation are essential for effective healthcare service delivery, leading to improvements in patient health and wellbeing. National policy dictates that research delivery is embedded into daily practice of United Kingdom (UK) healthcare professionals, including pharmacists. There is a limited understanding of critical care pharmacist research activities, experiences and interests. It is, therefore, important to describe current practice including barriers and facilitators to enable increased engagement. Objectives To describe UK critical care pharmacist research activity, experiences, interests and barriers to better engagement. Method An electronic survey was developed, piloted and distributed (June to October 2021) to all critical care pharmacists via UK professional organisations. Key findings The survey was completed by 126 pharmacists, providing a 54% response rate. Few pharmacists reported research capability (postgraduate qualification with a research component, 31% (39/126)) and opportunity (dedicated research time, 28.6% (36/126)), only 12.7% (16/126) have both these influencers. Those that did, produced significantly more research outputs (median 4 (0,9) versus 0 (0,1), P = 0.023) and undertook grant funding applications (X2 (1, n = 126) = 25.8, P < 0.001), compared to those without. The most frequently reported barrier to research was the time (opportunity), (71.4%, 90/126). Few pharmacists reported having a research mentor (13.3%, 16/120). Most pharmacists reported an interest in collaborating on research projects across a broad range of areas. Conclusions Critical care pharmacists are motivated to participate in the evaluation continuum including research, although most report capability and opportunity barriers to delivery. We suggest policy recommendations to address limitations and increase pharmacist research involvement.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

RSB

Department of Health and Social Care

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3