Community pharmacists’ attitudes towards checking prescriptions: a cross-sectional survey

Author:

van Loon W Ellen12ORCID,Lambert Maarten1ORCID,Heringa Mette3ORCID,Bouvy Marcel L4ORCID,Taxis Katja1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economy, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen , Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen , The Netherlands

2. Pharmacy De Drie Stellingen , Brink 1-101, 8431 LD Oosterwolde , The Netherlands

3. SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy , Theda Mansholtstraat 5-B, 2331 JE Leiden , The Netherlands

4. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University , Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background The final prescription check is a mandatory but time-consuming process in Dutch community pharmacies. A safer dispensing process may have made the final prescription check obsolete. Objective To describe the final prescription check in Dutch community pharmacies and explore pharmacists’ attitudes towards changing this. Methods A cross-sectional survey among Dutch community pharmacists. The online questionnaire was based on literature and previous qualitative research, piloted in three pharmacies, and took 10 min to complete. Results were analysed descriptively. Results A total of 409 pharmacists participated. They saw the final prescription check as an important quality assurance of the dispensing process. Nevertheless, most pharmacists agreed that the final prescription check could be optimized as they thought that the time invested outweighed the benefits. Automation of the dispensing process, only checking selected high-risk prescriptions, and more in-process checks could reduce the need for an extensive final prescription check, rather than delegating the task to assistants. To implement changes, most pharmacists felt current dispensing guidelines needed to be adapted. Conclusion There was a widespread consensus that optimizing the final prescription check could enhance efficiency and allow more time for person-centred care. Most pharmacists expressed a preference for updated guidelines before implementing such changes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3