Predictive factors for non-participation or partial participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programmes†

Author:

Dawidowicz Sébastien12,Le Breton Julien13,Moscova Laura1,Renard Vincent13,Bercier Sandrine14,Brixi Zahida4,Audureau Etienne35,Clerc Pascal36,Bastuji-Garin Sylvie35,Ferrat Emilie13

Affiliation:

1. Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France

2. Maison de Santé Pluri-professionnelle de Sucy-en-Brie, Sucy-en-Brie, France

3. DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology And Ageing Unit), Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France

4. Association de Dépistage Organisé des Cancers dans le Val-de-Marne, ADOC, Joinville-le-Pont, France

5. Department of Public Health, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France

6. Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université de Versailles, Versailles, France

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundNo study has investigated factors associated with non-participation or partial participation in the different combination patterns of screening programmes for all three cancers, that is, breast, colorectal and cervical cancer.MethodsIn a retrospective cohort study, we sought to describe combinations of cancer screening participation rates among women in the Val-de-Marne area of France and to identify individual and contextual factors associated with non-participation or partial participation.ResultsWomen aged between 50 and 65 and who were eligible for all three screening programmes (n = 102 219) were analysed in multilevel logistic models, with the individual as the Level 1 variable and the place of residence as the Level 2 variable. The women who did not participate in any of the screening programmes were 34.4%, whereas 30.1%, 24% and 11.5% participated in one, two or all three screening programmes, respectively. Age below 55, a previous false-positive mammography, prior opportunistic mammography only, no previous mammography, membership of certain health insurance schemes (all P < 0.05) and residence in a deprived area (P < 0.001) were independently associated with non-participation or partial participation. We observed a stronger effect of deprivation on non-participation in all three cancers than in combinations of screening programmes.ConclusionOur findings suggest that the health authorities should focus on improving cancer screenings in general rather than screenings for specific types of cancer, especially among younger women and those living in the most socially deprived areas.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3