“We’re trained to trust our patients”: a qualitative study on the general practitioners’ trust in patients for colorectal cancer shared care

Author:

Yong Faith R1234ORCID,Naicker Sundresan5ORCID,Uebel Kerry1ORCID,Agaliotis Maria6ORCID,Chan Christopher1ORCID,Nguyen John D T1ORCID,Pathirana Thanya7ORCID,Hawkey Alexandra8ORCID,Vuong Kylie17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales , Sydney , Australia

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia

3. Safe and Effective Medication Research Collaborative, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Science, University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia

4. Westmead Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney , Westmead , Australia

5. Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane , Australia

6. Australian Institute of Health Service Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania , Rozelle , Australia

7. School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University , Southport , Australia

8. Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University , Campbelltown , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making, and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. However, few empirical studies have explored physicians’ trust in patients and its implications for shared care models. Aim To explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs’ willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care. Methods GP participants were recruited through professional networks for semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were integrity checked, coded inductively, and themes developed iteratively. Results Twenty-five interviews were analysed. Some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physician and have a high propensity for trusting patients. For other GPs, trust in patients is developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients with whom they have a developed, trusting relationship. Conclusions Trust plays a significant role in the patient’s access to shared care. The implementation of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.

Funder

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3