Clinician responses to cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation: a systematic review and integrative mixed-methods research synthesis

Author:

Panday Janelle1ORCID,Taneja Shipra1ORCID,Popoola Anuoluwa1ORCID,Pack Rachael2ORCID,Greyson Devon34ORCID,McDonald Sarah D567ORCID,Black Morgan1ORCID,Murray-Davis Beth89ORCID,Darling Elizabeth689ORCID,Vanstone Meredith1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

2. Center for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada

3. Department of Communication, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States

4. School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

5. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

6. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

7. Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster Midwifery Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background Perinatal cannabis use is increasing, and clinician counselling is an important aspect of reducing the potential harm of cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation. To understand current counselling practices, we conducted a systematic review and integrative mixed-methods synthesis to determine “how do perinatal clinicians respond to pregnant and lactating patients who use cannabis?” Methods We searched 6 databases up until 2021-05-31. Eligible studies described the attitudes, perceptions, or beliefs of perinatal clinician about cannabis use during pregnancy or lactation. Eligible clinicians were those whose practice particularly focusses on pregnant and postpartum patients. The search was not limited by study design, geography, or year. We used a convergent integrative analysis method to extract relevant findings for inductive analysis. Results Thirteen studies were included; describing perspectives of 1,366 clinicians in 4 countries. We found no unified approach to screening and counselling. Clinicians often cited insufficient evidence around the effects of perinatal cannabis use and lacked confidence in counselling about use. At times, this meant clinicians did not address cannabis use with patients. Most counselled for cessation and there was little recognition of the varied reasons that patients might use cannabis, and an over-reliance on counselling focussed on the legal implications of use. Conclusion Current approaches to responding to cannabis use might result in inadequate counselling. Counselling may be improved through increased education and training, which would facilitate conversations to mitigate the potential harm of perinatal cannabis use while recognizing the benefits patients perceive.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3