Evaluation of an electronic clinical decision support system (DeSSBack) to improve low back pain management: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial

Author:

Tun Firzara Abdul Malik1ORCID,Teo Chin Hai12ORCID,Teh Shu Yi1ORCID,Su Je Yu1ORCID,Mohd Zaini Hana Salwani3ORCID,Suhaimi Anwar4ORCID,Ng Wei Leik1ORCID,Danaee Mahmoud5ORCID,Stevenson Kay678ORCID,Mallen Christian David9ORCID,Ng Chirk Jenn1011ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya , 50603 Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia

2. UM eHealth Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya , 50603 Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia

3. Department of Information Technology, University Malaya Medical Centre , 59100 Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia

4. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya , 50603 Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia

5. Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya , 50603 Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia

6. School of Allied Health Professions , Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG , United Kingdom

7. Impact Accelerator Unit, Medical School , Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG , United Kingdom

8. Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust , Staffordshire ST6 7AG , United Kingdom

9. School of Medicine , Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG , United Kingdom

10. Department of Research , SingHealth Polyclinics, SingHealth, Singapore 150167 , Singapore

11. Health Services & Systems Research , Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857 , Singapore

Abstract

Abstract Background Low back pain (LBP) is a common reason for primary care consultation; yet doctors often find managing it challenging. An electronic decision support system for LBP (DeSSBack) was developed based on an evidence-based risk stratification tool to improve the management of patients with LBP in a Malaysian primary care setting. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of DeSSBack for the conduct of a future definitive trial. Methods A pilot cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) with qualitative interviews was conducted. Each primary care doctor was considered a cluster and randomized to either the control (usual practice) or intervention (DeSSBack) group. Patient outcomes including Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a 10-point pain rating scale were measured at baseline and 2-month postintervention. The doctors in the intervention group were interviewed to explore feasibility and acceptability of using DeSSBack. Results Thirty-six patients with nonspecific LBP participated in this study (intervention n = 23; control n = 13). Fidelity was poor among patients but good among doctors. The RMDQ and anxiety score had medium effect sizes of 0.718 and 0.480, respectively. The effect sizes for pain score (0.070) and depression score were small (0.087). There was appreciable acceptability and satisfaction with use of DeSSBack, as it was helpful in facilitating thorough and standardized management, providing appropriate treatment plans based on risk stratification, improving consultation time, empowering patient-centred care, and easy to use. Conclusions A future cRCT to evaluate the effectiveness of DeSSBack is feasible to be conducted in a primary care setting with minor modifications. DeSSBack was found useful by doctors and can be improved to enhance efficiency. Trial registration The protocol of the cluster randomized controlled trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04959669).

Funder

University of Malaya Specialist Centre

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

Reference27 articles.

1. The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies;Hurwitz;Eur Spine J,2018

2. Recent developments and future research in the bone and joint decade 2000–2010;Heinegard;Bull World Health Organ,2003

3. International framework for red flags for potential serious spinal pathologies;Finucane;J Orthop Sports Phys Ther,2020

4. Most common reasons for primary care visits in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review;Bigio;PLOS Glob Public Health,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3