Relationship between microbiology of throat swab and clinical course among primary care patients with acute cough: a prospective cohort study

Author:

Ordóñez-Mena José M12ORCID,Fanshawe Thomas R1,Butler Chris C1ORCID,Mant David1,Longhurst Denise3,Muir Peter3,Vipond Barry3,Little Paul4,Moore Michael4,Stuart Beth4ORCID,Hay Alastair D5,Thornton Hannah V5,Thompson Matthew J6,Smith Sue1,Van den Bruel Ann7,Hardy Victoria8,Cheah Laikin1,Crook Derrick9,Knox Kyle1

Affiliation:

1. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

2. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK

3. South West Regional Laboratory, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK

4. University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK

5. Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

6. Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

7. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium

8. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

9. Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRTIs) account for most antibiotics prescribed in primary care despite lack of efficacy, partly due to clinician uncertainty about aetiology and patient concerns about illness course. Nucleic acid amplification tests could assist antibiotic targeting. Methods In this prospective cohort study, 645 patients presenting to primary care with acute cough and suspected ALRTI, provided throat swabs at baseline. These were tested for respiratory pathogens by real-time polymerase chain reaction and classified as having a respiratory virus, bacteria, both or neither. Three hundred fifty-four participants scored the symptoms severity daily for 1 week in a diary (0 = absent to 4 = severe problem). Results Organisms were identified in 346/645 (53.6%) participants. There were differences in the prevalence of seven symptoms between the organism groups at baseline. Those with a virus alone, and those with both virus and bacteria, had higher average severity scores of all symptoms combined during the week of follow-up than those in whom no organisms were detected [adjusted mean differences 0.204 (95% confidence interval 0.010 to 0.398) and 0.348 (0.098 to 0.598), respectively]. There were no differences in the duration of symptoms rated as moderate or severe between organism groups. Conclusions Differences in presenting symptoms and symptoms severity can be identified between patients with viruses and bacteria identified on throat swabs. The magnitude of these differences is unlikely to influence management. Most patients had mild symptoms at 7 days regardless of aetiology, which could inform patients about likely symptom duration.

Funder

NIHR School for Primary Care Research

NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3