Interprofessional follow-up of patients with cancer in France (the SINPATIC study): a preliminary, qualitative study of the patient’s perspective

Author:

Mirat William1ORCID,Moscova Laura1ORCID,Lustman Matthieu1,Dawidowicz Sebastien1,Picot Genevieve2,Lebel Audrey3,Cittée Jacques1ORCID,Ferrat Emilie14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Département de Médecine Générale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC) , Créteil , France

2. Centre de la Formation et du Developpement des Compétences, APHP , Paris , France

3. Departement d'Oncologie Médicale, APHP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC) , Créteil , France

4. Université Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB (CEpiA Team)   , Créteil , France

Abstract

Abstract Background In 2020, 19.2 million people were diagnosed with cancer, and nearly 10 million cancer patients died worldwide. An effective cancer care pathway must be based on coordination, multidisciplinarity, a personalized approach, and collaboration between stakeholders. Follow-up can be improved by good collaboration and communication between GPs and the cancer care team at a common level of organization. Objectives To study patients with solid cancers and assess their perceptions of the care pathway, the roles of the healthcare professionals involved, and interprofessional collaboration. Methods In a preliminary, qualitative study (part of the SINPATIC study of general practitioners, oncologists, nurses, and patients), adult patients with cancer in the Paris area of France were interviewed between January and April 2018. Using purposive sampling, 10 patients were recruited from hospital departments and primary care. An interview guide explored 3 themes: the care pathway, the stakeholders’ roles in follow-up, and interprofessional collaboration. Results For patients, dealing with cancer is a complex process of awareness, care provision, decision-making, task assignment, a lack of clarification of professional roles, a piecemeal announcement of the diagnosis of cancer by several stakeholders, organizational and administrative difficulties, non-formal collaboration in inertia (tending towards collaboration under construction), and with cancer follow-up that was usually parallel, sometimes shared, rarely sequential. Conclusion This SINPATIC substudy provided us a better understanding of the complexity of the patient care pathway. Looking forward, the present findings might stimulate thoughts on the design and development of interventional studies.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference44 articles.

1. Continuity of care interventions for preventing hospital readmission of older people with chronic diseases: a meta-analysis;Facchinetti;Int J Nurs Stud,2020

2. Stratégie décennale de lutte contre les cancers 2021-2030;Institut National du Cancer

3. Failing to plan is planning to fail: improving the quality of care with survivorship care plans;Earle;J Clin Oncol,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3