A study of patients' choice of medical treatment based on rational choice theory: a cross-sectional survey from China

Author:

Li Jin1ORCID,Zhao Ning2,Gu Mei2,Li Danhui3,Yang Jia2

Affiliation:

1. Hospital Office, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital , Guangdong, 518033 , China

2. School of Public Health, Capital Medical University , Beijing, 100069 , China

3. Medical Department, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital , Shaanxi, 710068 , China

Abstract

Abstract Objective To describe how patients choose between primary care institutions (PCIs) and non-PCIs using rational choice theory from the perspective of survival rationality, economic rationality, and social rationality. Methods Multi-stage stratified sampling and convenience sampling were applied to select 1723 patients to conduct the questionnaire survey. Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were performed to analyze the factors associated with patients’ choice of PCIs. Results In total 55.83% of 1723 patients would attend a PCIs for healthcare. The results of the univariate analysis revealed that patients who are female (58.46%, P = .015), suffering from chronic diseases (56.26%, P = .047), inpatients (67.58%, P < .001), Beijing (59.62%, P = .002), partial understanding of the family doctor contracting system (62.30%, P < .001), and not understanding of the medical alliance policy (58.04%, P = .031) had significantly higher probability of choosing PCIs. Logistic regression analysis showed that females were more unwilling to attend PCIs (odds ratio (OR) = 0.822, 95%CI: 0.676–0.999). Following survival rationality, patients without chronic diseases were more likely to attend PCIs (OR = 1.834, 95%CI: 1.029–3.268), and inpatients were more unlikely to attend PCIs (OR = 0.581, 95%CI: 0.437–0.774). From an economic rationality perspective, patients from the Fujian province were more likely to attend PCIs (OR = 1.424, 95%CI: 1.081–1.876). From a social rationality perspective, patients who partial understanding of the family doctor contracting system were more unlikely to attend PCIs (OR = 0.701, 95%CI: 0.551–0.892), and patients who partial and complete understanding of the medical alliance policy were more likely to attend PCIs (OR = 1.340, 95%CI: 1.064–1.687; OR = 1.485, 95%CI: 1.086–2.030). Conclusions Survival, economic, and social rationality are involved in patients’ choice to attend PCIs. Compared to survival rationality and social rationality, economic rationality showed a lower association with patients’ choice to attend PCIs. Medical institutions are recommended to adopt a “patient health-centered” approach when providing medical services and further optimize the family doctor contracting system and construction of medical alliances.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3