Barriers and facilitators to GP–patient communication about emotional concerns in UK primary care: a systematic review

Author:

Parker Daisy1,Byng Richard2,Dickens Chris1,Kinsey Debbie1,McCabe Rose3

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, UK

2. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK

3. School of Health Sciences, Division of Health Services Research and Management, City, University of London, London, UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn the UK, general practitioners (GPs) are the most commonly used providers of care for emotional concerns.ObjectiveTo update and synthesize literature on barriers and facilitators to GP–patient communication about emotional concerns in UK primary care.DesignSystematic review and qualitative synthesis.MethodWe conducted a systematic search on MEDLINE (OvidSP), PsycInfo and EMBASE, supplemented by citation chasing. Eligible papers focused on how GPs and adult patients in the UK communicated about emotional concerns. Results were synthesized using thematic analysis.ResultsAcross 30 studies involving 342 GPs and 720 patients, four themes relating to barriers were: (i) emotional concerns are difficult to disclose; (ii) tension between understanding emotional concerns as a medical condition or arising from social stressors; (iii) unspoken assumptions about agency resulting in too little or too much involvement in decisions and (iv) providing limited care driven by little time. Three facilitative themes were: (v) a human connection improves identification of emotional concerns and is therapeutic; (vi) exploring, explaining and negotiating a shared understanding or guiding patients towards new understandings and (vii) upfront information provision and involvement manages expectations about recovery and improves engagement in treatment.ConclusionThe findings suggest that treatment guidelines should acknowledge: the therapeutic value of a positive GP–patient relationship; that diagnosis is a two-way negotiated process rather than an activity strictly in the doctor’s domain of expertise; and the value of exploring and shaping new understandings about patients’ emotional concerns and their management.

Funder

Judi Meadows Memorial

McPin Foundation

University of Exeter Medical School

National Institute for Health Research

Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula

Department of Health and Social Care

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

Reference63 articles.

1. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013;Vos;Lancet,2015

2. General practitioner psychological management of common emotional problems (II): a research agenda for the development of evidence-based practice;Cape;Br J Gen Pract,2000

3. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis;Zolnierek;Med Care,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3