Regularity of contact with GPs: Measurement approaches to improve valid associations with hospitalization

Author:

Youens David1ORCID,Harris Mark2,Robinson Suzanne1,Preen David B3,Moorin Rachael E13

Affiliation:

1. Health Systems & Health Economics, School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

2. School of Economics and Finance, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

3. School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Studies examine longitudinal continuity of GP contact though few consider ‘regularity of GP contact’, i.e., the dispersion of contacts over time. Increased regularity may indicate planned ongoing care. Current measures of regularity may be correlated with the number of contacts and may not isolate the phenomenon of interest. Objectives To compare two published and one newly developed regularity index in terms of their ability to measure regularity of GP contacts independently of the number of contacts and the impact on their association with hospitalization. Methods A cohort at risk of diabetes-related hospitalization in Western Australia from 1990 to 2004 was identified using linked administrative data. For each regularity index, relationships with number of GP contacts were assessed. Hospitalization was then regressed on each index with and without number of contacts as a covariate. Results Among 153,414 patients the new regularity index showed a reduced association with number of contacts compared with existing indices. Associations with hospitalization differed between measures; for previously published indices, there were no significant associations between regularity and hospitalization, whereas on the new index, most regular GP contact was associated with reduced hospitalization (IRR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88–0.93). When number of contacts was added as a covariate, point estimates for this index showed little change, whereas for existing measures this addition changed point estimates. Conclusion A new measure of regularity of GP contact was less correlated with the number of contacts than previously published measures and better suited to estimating unconfounded relationships of regularity with hospitalization.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3