General practitioners’ views and experiences of communicating with older people about cancer screening: a qualitative study

Author:

Smith Jenna12ORCID,Dodd Rachael H123ORCID,Wallis Katharine A4ORCID,Naganathan Vasi56ORCID,Cvejic Erin2ORCID,Jansen Jesse127ORCID,McCaffery Kirsten J12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia

2. Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia

3. The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW , Sydney, NSW , Australia

4. General Practice Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia

5. Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation Hospital , Concord, NSW , Australia

6. Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia

7. School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background Older adults should be supported to make informed decisions about cancer screening. However, it is unknown how general practitioners (GPs) in Australia communicate about cancer screening with older people. Aim To investigate GPs’ views and experiences of communicating about cancer screening (breast, cervical, prostate, and bowel) with older people (≥70 years). Design and setting Qualitative, semi-structured interviews, Australia. Method Interviews were conducted with GPs practising in Australia (n = 28), recruited through practice-based research networks, primary health networks, social media, and email invitation. Interviews were audio-recorded and analysed thematically using Framework Analysis. Results Findings across GPs were organized into 3 themes: (i) varied motivation to initiate cancer screening discussions; some GPs reported that they only initiated screening within recommended ages (<75 years), others described initiating discussions beyond recommended ages, and some experienced older patient-initiated discussions; (ii) GPs described the role they played in providing screening information, whereby detailed discussions about the benefits/risks of prostate screening were more likely than other nationally funded screening types (breast, cervical, and bowel); however, some GPs had limited knowledge of recommendations and found it challenging to explain why screening recommendations have upper ages; (iii) GPs reported providing tailored advice and discussion based on personal patient preferences, overall health/function, risk of cancer, and previous screening. Conclusions Strategies to support conversations between GPs and older people about the potential benefits and harms of screening in older age and rationale for upper age limits to screening programmes may be helpful. Further research in this area is needed.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3