Affiliation:
1. University Institute for Primary Care (IuMFE), University of Geneva , 1211 Geneva , Switzerland
2. University Heart Center Zurich, University Hospital Zurich Department of Cardiology, , 8091 Zurich , Switzerland
3. University College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 , 69008 Lyon , France
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Many patients may be tempted to use non-pharmacological home remedies (NPHRs) to relieve various complaints. To the best of our knowledge, there is little data on the characteristics of patients using NPHRs. In this cross-sectional study carried out between March 2020 and July 2021, we examined the socio-demographic factors underlying their use in patient populations in Switzerland and France.
Methods
Using official registries, we randomly selected 50 primary care physicians (PCPs) in Geneva (Switzerland) and Lyon/Grenoble (France). Seven research assistants consecutively recruited patients from PCP waiting rooms (20–25 patients per practice). Patients completed a paper-based questionnaire assessing the use [yes/no] of 304 NPHRs for 79 medical conditions. The NPHR list was developed by our team with input from 97 patients. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regressions, adjusting for intra-cluster correlations, to examine associations between NPHR use and patient characteristics (gender, age, practice location, nationality, education level, and self-rated health).
Results
Of the 1198 eligible patients, 1012 agreed to participate (85%). Overall, 635 patients (63%) reported using at least one of the remedies tested in the study. In multivariable analysis, women (OR = 1.7 [95%CI = 1.3–2.3], P-value < 0.001), younger patients (< 40 years: OR = 2.1 [95%CI = 1.6–2.9], P-value < 0.001), and French patients (OR = 1.6 [95%CI = 1.1–2.3], P-value < 0.001) tended to use NPHRs more often than other patients.
Conclusions
Many patients, particularly women, young people, and French patients, reported using NPHRs. This survey’s findings hold the potential to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers about the diverse preferences that shape patients’ healthcare choices.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)