General practitioners’ role in improving health care in care homes: a realist review

Author:

Chadborn Neil H12ORCID,Devi Reena3ORCID,Goodman Claire45ORCID,Williams Christopher D6ORCID,Sartain Kate7ORCID,Gordon Adam L128ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, University of Nottingham , Derby , United Kingdom

2. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration-East Midlands (ARC-EM) , Nottingham , United Kingdom

3. School of Healthcare, University of Leeds , Leeds , United Kingdom

4. Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire , Hatfield , United Kingdom

5. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration-East of England (ARC-EoE) , Cambridge , United Kingdom

6. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester , Leicester , United Kingdom

7. School of Medicine, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , United Kingdom

8. University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust , Derby , United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite recent focus on improving health care in care homes, it is unclear what role general practitioners (GPs) should play. To provide evidence for future practice we set out to explore how GPs have been involved in such improvements. Methods Realist review incorporated theory-driven literature searches and stakeholder interviews, supplemented by focussed searches on GP-led medication reviews and end-of-life care. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library were searched. Grey literature was identified through internet searches and professional networks. Studies were included based upon relevance. Data were coded to develop and test contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes for improvements involving GPs. Results Evidence was synthesized from 30 articles. Programme theories described: (i) “negotiated working with GPs,” where other professionals led improvement and GPs provided expertise; and (ii) “GP involvement in national/regional improvement programmes.” The expertise of GPs was vital to many improvement programmes, with their medical expertise or role as coordinators of primary care proving pivotal. GPs had limited training in quality improvement (QI) and care home improvement work had to be negotiated in the context of wider primary care commitments. Conclusions GPs are central to QI in health care in care homes. Their contributions relate to their specialist expertise and recognition as leaders of primary care but are challenged by available time and resources to develop this role.

Funder

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration-East Midlands

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration-East of England

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Advance Care Planning in the United Kingdom – A snapshot from the four UK nations;Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen;2023-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3