Assessment of a Primary Support Program: family physicians and mental health professionals’ perspective

Author:

Gil-Girbau Montserrat1234ORCID,Peñarrubia-Maria Maria-Teresa2456ORCID,Carbonell-Simeón Davinia5,Rodríguez-Ferraz Brenda5,Contaldo Salvatore-Fabrizio27,Iglesias-González Maria268ORCID,Fernández-Vergel Rita2345ORCID,Blanco-García Elena245,Baladon-Higuera Luisa12346ORCID,Serrano-Blanco Antoni12346ORCID,Rubio-Valera Maria1246ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu , Barcelona , Spain

2. Grup de Recerca PRISMA (SGR1209), Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu , Esplugues de Llobregat , Spain

3. Primary Care Prevention and Health Promotion Research Network (redIAPP) , Barcelona , Spain

4. Grup ECONSAP, Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAP Jordi Gol) , Barcelona , Spain

5. Centre d’Atenció Primària Bartomeu Fabrés Anglada , Gavà , Spain

6. Grup 58 del Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) , Madrid , Spain

7. Psychiatry Department, CSMA d’Esplugues de Llobregat , Esplugues de Llobregat , Spain

8. Psychiatry Service, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol , IGTP Campus Can Ruti, Badalona , Spain

Abstract

Abstract Background Mental health (MH) disorders are increasingly prevalent in primary care (PC) and this has generated, in recent years, the development of strategies based on the collaborative model and the stepped care model. The Primary Support Program (PSP) was implemented in the community of Catalonia (Spain) during 2006 to improve, from the first level of care, treatment of the population with mild–moderate complexity MH problems along with identification and referral of severe cases to specialized care. The aim of the present study was to identify the strengths and limitations of the PSP from the perspective of health professionals involved in the programme. Methods An explanatory qualitative study based on Grounded Theory. We conducted group semistructured interviews with 37 family physicians and 34 MH professionals. A constant comparative method of analysis was performed. Results Operation of the PSP is influenced by internal factors, such as the programme framework, MH liaison, management of service supply and demand, and the professional team involved. Additionally, external factors which had an impact were related to the patient, the professionals, the Health System, and community resources. Conclusions The operation of the PSP could benefit from a review of the programme framework and optimization of MH liaison. Improvements are also proposed for MH training in PC, intraprofessional coordination, use of community resources, and creation of efficient continuous assessment systems.

Funder

CIBERESP

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness

Ministry of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3