Developing a scale measuring the doctor–patient relationship in China from the perspective of doctors

Author:

Tao Siyi12ORCID,Liu Chaojie3ORCID,Wu Qunhong1ORCID,Zhao Juan1ORCID,Xue Yuxin14ORCID,Song Weijian15ORCID,Sun Minglei1ORCID,Wang Chen1ORCID,Zou Dandan1ORCID,Liu Wei1ORCID,Hao Yanhua1ORCID,Jiao Mingli1ORCID,Sun Hong1ORCID,Li Ye1ORCID,Shan Linghan1ORCID,Liang Libo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China

2. Academic Affair Office, Dean’s Office of Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Xinzhan District, Hefei, Anhui, China

3. Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

4. Office of discipline supervision & investigation, Chengyang People’s Hospital, Chengyang District, Qingdao, Shandong, China

5. Department of Humanity and Social Sciences, Harbin Medical University, High-tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The doctor–patient relationship is usually measured in line with patient needs and demands. This study aimed to develop a scale measuring such a relationship from the perspective of doctors. Methods A draft scale was developed and adapted to the hospital context of China based on several existing scales, with an intention to measure how medical doctors view and manage their relationship with patients beyond episodic clinical encounters. Two rounds of Delphi consultations involving 14 experts were conducted to seek their consensus on the inclusion and descriptions of items. This resulted in a 19-item scale measuring four domains of the relationship. The scale was validated through a survey of 1,712 medical doctors selected from 27 public hospitals in Heilongjiang province of China. The internal consistency of the scale was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficients of the four domains. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the construct validity of the scale. Linear regression analyses were performed to assess the known-group validity of the scale. Results The scale measures four domains. The Cronbach’s α of the scale reached an acceptable level, ranging from 0.61 to 0.78 for its four domains. Good fitness of data into the four-domain structure of the scale was confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis. Known-group differences were demonstrated in the regression analyses. Conclusion The doctor–patient relationship scale developed in this study is a psychometrically valid tool assessing how medical doctors view and manage their relationship with patients in the hospital setting in China.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

China Postdoctoral Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Family Practice

Reference48 articles.

1. The doctor-patient relationship: toward a conceptual re-examination;Namazi;J Med Ethics Hist Med,2016

2. Doctor-patient communication: a review;Ha;Ochsner J,2010

3. The physician-patient relationship: recent developments and changes;Hellín;Haemophilia,2002

4. Chinese minority perceives the doctor-patient relationship differently: a cultural and economic interpretation;Yang;Front Public Health,2019

5. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance;Bordin;Psychother Theory Res Pract,1979

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3