Exercise, Manual Therapy, and Booster Sessions in Knee Osteoarthritis: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Bove Allyn M1,Smith Kenneth J2,Bise Christopher G3,Fritz Julie M4,Childs John D5,Brennan Gerard P6,Abbott J Haxby7,Fitzgerald G Kelley3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 210, Pittsburgh PA 15219

2. Section of Decision Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

3. Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh

4. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

5. Evidence in Motion, San Antonio, and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Baylor University, Waco, Texas

6. Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah

7. Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Abstract

Abstract Background Limited information exists regarding the cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Objective The study objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of 4 different combinations of exercise, manual therapy, and booster sessions for individuals with knee OA. Design This economic evaluation involved a cost-effectiveness analysis performed alongside a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Setting The study took place in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Salt Lake City, Utah; and San Antonio, Texas. Participants The study participants were 300 individuals taking part in a randomized controlled trial investigating various physical therapy strategies for knee OA. Intervention Participants were randomized into 4 treatment groups: exercise only (EX), exercise plus booster sessions (EX+B), exercise plus manual therapy (EX+MT), and exercise plus manual therapy and booster sessions (EX+MT+B). Measurements For the 2-year base case scenario, a Markov model was constructed using the United States societal perspective and a 3% discount rate for costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated to compare differences in cost per QALY gained among the 4 treatment strategies. Results In the 2-year analysis, booster strategies (EX+MT+B and EX+B) dominated no-booster strategies, with both lower health care costs and greater effectiveness. EX+MT+B had the lowest total health care costs. EX+B cost${\$}$1061 more and gained 0.082 more QALYs than EX+MT+B, for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of${\$}$12,900/QALY gained. Limitations The small number of total knee arthroplasty surgeries received by individuals in this study made the assessment of whether any particular strategy was more successful at delaying or preventing surgery in individuals with knee OA difficult. Conclusions Spacing exercise-based physical therapy sessions over 12 months using periodic booster sessions was less costly and more effective over 2 years than strategies not containing booster sessions for individuals with knee OA.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3