Forum: Navigating the Global South Landscape: Insights and Implications for Representation and Inclusion in ISA Journals

Author:

Chagas-Bastos Fabrício H1,Resende Erica2,Ghosn Faten3,Lisle Debbie4

Affiliation:

1. University of Copenhagen, Denmark / University of São Paulo , Brazil

2. Brazilian War College , Brazil

3. University of Essex , United Kingdom

4. Queen's University Belfast , United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract The International Studies Association (ISA) is widely recognized as an American-European-centric professional organization, with Global South scholars traditionally representing a minority of its membership. This pattern largely reflects the development of the International Relations (IR) discipline and its publication trends. In this Forum, we examine the progress made in the representation of Global South scholars within the IR discipline over the past decade, specifically focusing on the ISA as the primary professional body for IR scholars. We tackle some issues the Global South Task Force (GSTF) highlighted to a more assertive representativeness of the Global South within the ISA. Our analysis concentrates on ISA's journals data tracking to capture the current state of affairs and foster dialogue on developing inventive solutions to enhance diversity, intellectual plurality, and scholarly cultures within the IR discipline. Rather than resorting to outright criticism, we adopt a constructive stance, discussing attempted solutions and proposing steps to advance the discipline.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference48 articles.

1. Why is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction;Acharya;International Relations of the Asia Pacific,2007

2. Diversity for and by Whom? Knowledge Production and the Management of Diversity in International Relations;Alejandro;International Politics Reviews,2021

3. Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The Curious World of Publishing in Contemporary International Relations;Aydinli;International Studies Perspectives,2000

4. How Not to Globalise IR: ‘Centre’ and ‘Periphery’ as Constitutive of ‘the International;Bilgin;Uluslararasi Iliskiler,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3