Abstract
Abstract
Environmental shocks in the form of natural disasters are well known for their impact on domestic economies. Less known, however, is their impact on the global economy. The scant existing literature suggests that macro-economic impacts manifest in observed empirical decreases in international trade. The literature, however, does not examine whether the impact of natural disasters on trade varies for trading partners with differing levels of market integration. This paper examines if preferential liberalization serves to protect or buffer against the negative economic consequences of natural disasters. I show that deep preferential liberalization can not only protect countries against the negative macro-economic impact of natural disasters but can actually allow countries to increase exports during natural disaster events that otherwise induce trade decline. These findings suggest that by allowing countries to expand the quantity and the range of exports, preferential trade agreements lead to enhanced resilience against exogenous shocks.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference78 articles.
1. “High Wage Workers and High Wage Firms.”;Abowd;Econometrica,1999
2. “Computing Person and Firm Effects Using Linked Longitudinal Employer-Employee Data (No. 2002-06).”;Abowd,2002
3. “Why Do Some International Institutions Contain Strong Dispute Settlement Provisions? New Evidence from Preferential Trade Agreements.”;Allee;The Review of International Organizations,2016
4. Earthquakes in Mexico: We Are Not Changing Our 2017 Growth Forecast and We Introduce a Positive Bias for 2018;Amador;BBVA Research,2017
5. “The Politics of Trade Agreement Design: Revisiting the Depth–Flexibility Nexus.”;Baccini;International Studies Quarterly,2015
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献